Tuesday, September 24, 2019

work record 1 shadows



work record 1- working with shadows


for this shoot, i am going to aim for around 5 final images that i can edit and present as a response to my chosen artist. 

my research influence for this shoot is Tim Noble and sue Webster. they are two British artist that have been working together for over 17 years and have won many awards such as the honorary doctors of art degree. the exhibition i have been most interested is the series of sculptures they created that consisted of a pile of different materials such as rubbish or animal parts, that when you shone a light at the right angle, it would cast a shadow of images such as a man and a woman. they make you look more closely at the shadow rather that at the sculpture making it. 



this image shows the shadow of two people leaning against each other. one is holding what looks like a cigarette, and the other is holding a glass of wine. they both have their heads tilted back which suggests they are tired or fed up, or possibly just want to be touching. these two people could be in a relationship that inst working out but the don't want to let go. this is because they are both drinking and smoking which could be interpreted as a coping mechanism, they are also facing away from each other, suggesting there are some negative feelings between them, but they are still touching which could suggest they want to be close, even if they don't want to see each other.




this photo shows two peoples heads looking away from one another. one has their mouth open while the other looks like their brow is furrowed. the head on the right could be shouting or talking. the head on the left could be seen as angry or puzzled. the message behind this piece could show an argument has occurring between these people. the heads are joined which could suggest there is a relationship between them.

contact sheet


images that require improvement




























the issue with the first photo was, i had the camera on bracketing which meant it took images at different exposures, one being very high and the other being very low. because of this there are many black shots where i was working in a dark room and the camera took a very low exposure, which meant it came out incredibly dark. if i was to take this photo again, i would make sure the camera is on the correct settings.

the first picture is very blurred and not level. this is because i didn't use a tripod and took the shot while standing. shooting in a dark room meant i had to use a longer shutter speed which also meant the camera needed to be complete;y still, which in this case it wasn't. if i were to take this shot again, i would use a tripod and possibly a remote release to make sure the camera doesn't move while the shutter is open.

best images

i think this photo was effective because the horse and cart is isolated against the background which means the viewer is solely focused on the shadow. it also shows the horses legs and how they're in a pose that indicates movement, which gives the impression of movement in the photo.















i chose these photos because they are sharp and clearly capture a shadow. these were all taken towards the second part of the shoot, which was after i realised the camera was on bracketing. i was able to edit these and sharpen the shadow more.

i also chose these because i really like the effect of the elongated shadow. it looks almost haunting and reminds me of a fairy tale scene.

refining my work



when editing these photos, i didn't want to manipulate them too much as i only needed to capture the shadow. for this photo, i used Photoshop to brighten the image and increase the contrast because i wanted to make the shadow stand out more. i also chose to convert all of my photos to black and white. this was because i wanted the main focus to be on the shadow and not the colourful card i was using.

























with this image in particular, i used the spot healing brush to get rid of the black spots from the dust inside the lens.


final images



overall, i am pleased with the results of the shoot. my original aim was to clearly capture the shadow of the carriage, which i feel i have achieved.  the best photos from the shoot are definitely the elongated shadows as they are the clearest and more eye catching compared to the rest of the shoot.

if i were to do this shoot again, i would use a tripod the whole time, make sure the camera is on the correct settings. the issues i had with the shoot were easily fixed but cost a lot of time to recognise and figure out how to correct.


progression

the next shoot i would like to complete is one where humans are interacting with shadows. these could either be from a comedic point of view or a more dark point of view.  some images that have inspired me for example are ones where someone may be pretending to fight a shadow or play a card game. i think these would be really interesting and fun to make.

































Friday, September 20, 2019

photographer research

photographer research


Tim Noble and Sue Webster

for my first photographer, i have chosen Tim noble and Sew Webster. these are two British artists who have worked together for over 17 years and are internationally recognised for the art that they create. they both have received honorary doctors of art degrees as well as many other prestigious awards. they usually work with pieces of rubbish (but have been known to work with scrap metal and taxidermy) that they use to make sculptures. the sculpture i will be looking at are the shadow sculptures. these are sculptures made of things like rubbish or in some cases, metal casts of dead vermin and other strange materials, that cast a shadow of an object, usually people, when a strong light is directed at the right point.









in this photo, there is a pile of rubbish that when the light hits it, creates a shadow of two people with their backs to each other. one is holding a cigarette and the other is holding what looks like a glass of wine. the thing that i immediately feel when i see this picture is that these two people are at the end of a relationship and are using smoking and alcohol as a way of making themselves feel better. they are sat with their backs to each other but they are leaning against each other. this could suggest that there are still feelings of affection between them but for some unknown reason, the relationship is coming to an end. i like this photo because of the feelings it can provoke from something as simple as a shadow.


similar to the photo above, there are what looks shadows of a man and a woman facing away from each other and leaning. their expressions look like ones of frustration and exasperation. there may be a common theme through these artists's work of heartbreak or the reality of real life relationships as many of their pieces involve a man and a woman close to each other but facing in opposite directions.




in this image, there are what looks like there are two heads on spikes. these heads have been made of what looks like pieces of dead animals, including a dead crow sat on one of the heads and picking out an eye. this is quite a disturbing images on both levels as the shadow is just as morbid as what has been used to create it. this piece could be used to signify the reversal of roles. the shadow shows two human heads on display, where as some humans enjoy making taxidermy animals by killing them, preserving them and putting them on display. in this case the shadows are what strike you first , but the more you look at it, the more you notice the materials used to make the piece. further more, this signifies how people are usually first to notice when something brutal is done to a human, but when it happens to an animal, it is looked at as a hobby.



in this photo, there are two human heads made from the shadow cast by sculpture made from rubbish. both heads are pointed downwards, one with their mouth open and the other  with their brow furrowed. by the shape of the faces, one looks male and the other looks female. the woman looks like she is shouting or talking loudly. the man looks contemplative or possibly angry. this could suggest that an argument has occurred between them. they are both facing away from each other which could also suggest that there's tension. however, both the heads are connected which could indicate that they are emotionally close to each other but don't want to look at one another.



Russ and Reyn

Russ and Reyn are two photographers who have been working together since 2007. they met and the Uni of Utah, and moved to NYC. their style of work is witty, minimalist and highly organised photos that have many different styles and have had work in fashion and furniture. they said that the believe something has been lost in modern digital photography, which they would like to try and get back. 




this image shows the back of a woman's coat being lifted by a giant shadow hand. the message behind it could be that she is being harassed by the hand. it looks like quite a masculine shadow, compared to one of a woman's hand, which would usually be more dainty and slender. this could link to feminism/patriarchy and how women have been seen more as objects to be looked at than as people.










this photo shows a woman stood next to a dog shadow puppet. she has her arm out as if she is petting it. this image includes a clever detail in the way that the leash is suspended in mid air as if it was attached to the dog. this obviously is impossibly as a shadow isn't a physical object. there may be a hook on the wall or a piece of string attached to keep it suspended. i like this image because it is simple at first as it just looks like a lady pretending to pet a shadow dog. but as you look closer, the small detail of the leash adds subtle sophistication to the photo.











this image shows a woman who appears to be picked up by a huge shadow hand. this hand could represent something that is controlling her. this could further represent the way women were treated as objects rather than people in the past. the hand could show the patriarchy and how it isn't letting her go where she wants to go. the lady in the photo doesn't look alarmed however, which could be a sign of her accepting how shes being treated, just like many did during those times.

to achieve this photo, they probably used a very harsh light such as a model light with a reflector. the hand would've been held close to the light source to make the shadow bigger. to make it look like shes being picked up by the hand, she could have jumped to make it look like her legs are off the ground.
















this image is of a woman who looks as though she is trying to fight off or get away from a giant shadow hand that is looming over her. this was most probably done by holding the hand close to the light source so that it appears much larger than it actually is in the shadow. the hand in this photo could represent many different things, such as a physical embodiment of a fear she has or something she is worried about that she feels is following her and is out to get her. furthermore, this could could represent modern patriarchy or unrealistic beauty standards. she could also just be actually running from a giant which is a sightly comedic way of looking at it. i chose this image because it shows how you can give the impression of someone interacting with a shadow even though it isn't a physical object that you can touch or move.




Fred Eerdekens






this photo shows a piece of wire that has been bent in a way that projects a shadow when a light is shone at a certain angle. it says "everything in life is a metaphor for everything else". i like this piece because it is a very blunt way of looking at the world but it makes perfect sense. it means everything can be related in someway to everything else. if you try hard enough, you can relate to almost anything. it could also mean that true messages get lost in what people decide to project around them. what they're saying is a metaphor for something else. the use of the bent wire is especially important in this one because it looks like a tangled mess from the front but when you look at its shadow, it makes perfect sense.





the wire in this photo says "we are strangers in utopia". this could be interpreted as someone saying, when were in a good place, mentally or physically, we tend to forget about each other and only pay attention to what were feeling. i like this phrase as it looks at how we think but may not realise it. it shines a light on how easily humans can become unintentionally selfish and disregard other. the fact that this was written in a wire and can only be read by looking at its shadow could signify how its hidden from our immediate thoughts, but subconsciously, it is plausible and definitely something most people have experienced.




the question you never asked yourself. this piece can be used made to make people think about what their question could be. the use of the wire in this photo could be a way of representing the need for a new perspective. you have to see things from an alternative angle for them to make sense.







found something i wasn't really looking for. much like the other photos, this was made to provoke thoughts in the viewers. it could make them reflect on something they may have found unexpectedly. this could be a person, object, song etc. the way that this has been presented could represent how something unexpected was found. the light representing something becoming more clear or uncovered.

Tomas Maly

Unfortunately, I was unable to find much information on this photographer apart from, he belongs to a website called Getty Images, which is a website for royalty free images that people can use. I found the image through a website showing different forms of shadow photography, and his piece is one that stood out.


In this photo, there is the chess piece of a knight in the foreground, with the shadow of a rearing horse with wings behind it. This photo could reflect what the chess piece represents in the game and how it is supposed to defend the king. When a horse is on its hind legs, it usually means it is attacking or scaring off an enemy. In this image, this shadow could be used to represent the loyalty of the piece and how it is supposed to be used as a line of defence against the opposing players pieces. I like this image because it uses a shadow to represent a deeper meaning behind the pieces in a chess game and how they are used to defend each player's king.
















































































































Friday, September 13, 2019

slow sync flash

slow sync flash


slow sync flash is a technique where the subject is frozen in motion by the flash, with a transparent silhouette of them in motion. you will need a modelling light and a snoot to direct a strong light. you also need a dark background so that it isn't visible.



this is a piece of equipment we used called a snoot. it is used to allow the photographer to control the radius and direction of the light source when photographing a subject. in this scenario, it was used to direct the model light (a halogen and tungsten bulb that produces a strong light).

 the camera settings are as follows:
shutter speed of 2 seconds
ISO of 800
light meter reading of 5.6
F8


here are some examples of this technique






























overall, i enjoyed this technique and am interested in the result it produced. i would like to use this in my project as i think it would be interesting to experiment with shadows.

























multiple flash photography

multiple flash photography


this is a form of photography where a subject is photographed in movement as a bright flash is set off to capture the movement. for this technique you need a long exposure of around 4 seconds and a flash speed of around 1/125 and an aperture of 22. the flash need to go off multiple times to get multiple stages of motion in the photo. you would also need a light source directly above the subject which could either be in a soft box or on a hot-shoe (attached a radio transmitter that sends a signal to the lights and causes them to flash) and a black background.

here are some examples








































































Tuesday, September 10, 2019

critical and contextual analysis

critical and contextual analysis

Denotative meaning: the literal face-value meaning of a sign.

Connotative meaning: all the social, cultural, and historical meanings that are added to a sign's literal meaning.
Punctuman object or image that jumps out at the viewer within a photograph.

Studium: indicates the factor that initially draws the viewer to a photograph. It refers to the intention of the photographer; the viewer can determine the studium of a photograph with their logical, intellectual mind.

 Semiotics: the observation of symbolism used within photography or "reading" the picture.




Mendel Grossman was a Jewish photographer in the Lodz (Litzmannstadt) ghetto, born in 1913. He was a slim man of less than average height with sloping shoulders, his coat hanging on him as if it were not cut to his size, even his shoes appearing too large for him.

His eyes expressed goodness, a clever smile played on his lips, his steps were measured and he always carried a stuffed briefcase.  That was Mendel Grossman, a young man of a Hasidic family, the type of a former Talmudic student who had left the straight and narrow path. He was avid for knowledge, a lover of literature, the theatre and the arts, a painter, a sculptor, and also an amateur photographer who believed that photography was an art.

His photographs flowers, still-life, landscapes, street scenes, portraits, taken against the background of clouds, were works of art filled with expression, leaving strong impressions on the viewer. Eventually Mendel Grossman began to concentrate on one subject – man in motion. The transition came abruptly, and by accident. The Habimah theatre was visiting Lodz and Mendel hidden in the wings, photographed the performances.

No one asked him to do it he did it for himself alone. Here were men and women in motion, in classical motion there was dancing, varied and strange facial expressions, laughter, fear, pain, as well as make-up, costumes, light, stage settings.

When later he locked himself in his darkroom to develop the films he was astonished by the power of his photographs, he actually succeeded in arresting men in motion. All those who saw the pictures extolled their excellence, but Mendel knew that he was only at the beginning of this particular journey.

Habimah left, and Mendel directed his lens to the street, to the suburbs inhabited by Jews, the slums. He now found motion and expression not on the stage, but in the streets, among children playing, labourers at work in the Jewish quarter of Baluty.

His photographs gained a measure of respect, and Mendel achieved recognition as an artist- photographer. In the beginning of 1939, the management of TOZ, the Jewish organisation for the protection of children’s health, approached him with an attractive proposition – to prepare an album of pictures of Jewish children.

The accent was to be on the poor Jewish child in the streets. Mendel enthusiastically accepted the proposition and was soon ready with a series of photographs. It was the summer of 1939, the album never appeared and the photographs got lost in the war, and at the same time so did their subjects the Jewish child.

The idyllic life of discussions on art ceased with the outbreak of war and the first contact with a brutal occupier, then the Star of David to denote a Jew, and the creation of ghettos. Mendel was ready with his camera. No longer did he photograph flowers, clouds, still life’s and landscapes. In the horror of the Lodz ghetto he had found his mission, to photograph and thus record the great tragedy taking place in the ghetto before his eyes.

Mendel Grossman knew how to photograph, he knew how to observe and perceive what happened around him, and what is most important – he saw the people surrounding him. He photographed them in their suffering, as they sank into the depths of pain, in their struggles, in their illnesses, and in their death.

He recorded with his camera what took place in the tortured ghetto, the Holocaust at its intensity.
He gave up his artistic ambitions of the past, his mission was now clear, to leave to the world – if a world was to remain – a tangible testimony of the great tragedy, of the horrible crime, in a language understood by all nations.

Evicted from his house in the centre of town, Mendel found a flat in the ghetto where he settled with his parents, two sisters, brother –in-law and little nephew. The story of his family is typical of Jewish families in Lodz. Mendel realised this, and intensively photographed his loved ones, so that over the years he created a horrifying record of their slow progress toward death.

Mendel obtained a job in the photographic laboratory of the department of statistics in the ghetto, the office in which all the true information concerning the ghetto was collected. Covered by its official status, the staff of the department accumulated written material.

They did not only record dry facts, as statisticians usually do, but wrote down every rumour passing through the ghetto, every change in the distribution of food rations, every event no matter how unimportant. They also collected photographs, ostensibly to demonstrate models of products of the ghetto workshops, and identification photographs for work permits. The laboratory had a good supply of film and printing paper, and also served as an ideal camouflage for Mendel’s real job.

He spent most of his time in the streets, in the narrow alleys, in homes, in soup kitchens, in bread lines, in workshops, at the cemetery. The chief subject was people. He did not seek beauty, for there was no beauty in the ghetto, there were children bloated with hunger, eyes searching for a crust of bread, living “death notices” as those near death, but still on their feet were called in ghetto slang.

He photographed conveys of men and women condemned to death in the gas-vans of Chelmno, public executions, in one incident, a whole family passed through the street dragging a wagon filled with excrement, a father, mother, son and daughter, the parents in front pulling, and the children pushing from the sides.

Mendel stopped but did not take out his camera, he hesitated to photograph the degradation of those people. But the head of the family halted and asked Mendel to photograph, “Let it remain for the future, let others know humiliated we were.” Mendel no longer hesitated, he gave into the urge which motivated so many Jews to leave a record, to write down the events, to collect documents, to scratch a name on the wall of the prison cell, to write next to the name of the condemned the word “vengeance.”

Mendel had heart trouble and he was forbidden to make any physical effort. The Gestapo was also on his tracks and his friends warned him, his family insisted that he stop endangering his life. But he did not heed any warnings, no event in the ghetto passed without him photographing it. To fool the police he carried his camera under his coat.

He kept his hands in his pockets, which were cut open inside, and he thus could manipulate the camera. He directed the lens by turning his body in the direction he wanted, then slightly parted his coat, and clicked the shutter. This method worked very well.

In one of the stages of the destruction of the Jewish people the Germans deported the remnants of the Jewish communities of Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia and Luxemburg, and brought them to the Lodz ghetto. Mendel received the arrivals with camera in hand. Here were characters of a new kind, with a different appearance, different manners. They were well dressed, they carried heavy suitcases, were well provided with food.

They were horror stricken at the sight of the ghetto, they refused contact with the old inhabitants of the ghetto whose appearance repelled them. They tried to swim against the current and quickly gave up, they collapsed spiritually and physically.

Mendel and his camera followed this process which ended when the Germans collected the pitiful remnants and again loaded them onto trains, this time the trains were bound for Chelmno. Mendel after taking a long distance photo, hidden in a room overlooking Bazarny Square of an execution of a Jew from Vienna, who had been arrested outside of the ghetto, was able to photograph another execution close up.

On a cloudy day he again ventured out with his camera this time to an open field on Marysinska Street. Unlike the first time, Mendel did not take up a protected position, but stood behind a German policeman, in the front row of the crowd.

As usual the camera was suspended from a strap around his neck, the coat was slightly parted, and his hands under the coat directed the lens to the scaffold. The condemned young man, was brought in a cart. He still did not realise what was going to happen to him. He noticed at first a large crowd, and then the dangling noose. Now he knew. Without uttering a sound he ascended the scaffold, his head down.

The crowd held its breath, the distant cries of the condemned man’s wife also ceased. The German’s were tense as the hangman tightened the noose around the victim’s neck. Mendel clicked the shutter, the silence was so absolute that even this muted sound reached the ears of a German policeman, and he turned his head.

Pale with excitement, Mendel returned to the small darkroom in his flat to develop the picture. This time the photograph was clear in every detail.

Still Mendel thought that he should change his technique, from then on he climbed electric power posts to photograph a convoy of deportees on their way to the trains, he walked roofs, climbed the steeple of a church that remained within the confines of the ghetto in order to photograph a change of guard at the barbed-wire fence.

Weak and sick, he found it difficult to accomplish all those feats, but he was contemptuous of danger and did not heed the pleadings of friends. Inside the church he discovered a strange world – a surrealistic picture which could be only the product of morbid fantasy – the entire interior was covered with a thick layer of white feathers.

Waves of feathers rose into the air with each step, each movement. Every breeze caused a cloud of feathers to form in the air. The altar of carved wood, the figures of the saints, and the huge organ – all were covered with feathers, all undulated in the breeze.

Amidst all that he saw human figures, also wrapped in white, sitting, running around, standing. A small sign attached to the entrance attempted to explain what was happening inside. It read Institute for Feather Cleaning, but the sign did not tell the whole truth. The Church was the place to which the bedding robbed from Jews who were sent to death from Lodz and surrounding towns was being brought.

There, in the Church of the Virgin Mary, the pillows and featherbeds were ripped open by Jewish men and women, then the feathers were cleaned, sorted, packed and shipped to Germany, to merchants who sold them in the Reich.

Mendel spent many weeks in the church, covered with feathers. He looked for varied angles which would fully explain to future generations what was happening in that church. He created evidence of the crime, the full extent of which was not yet known to him. Only his intuition told him that this must be recorded.

The collection of negatives grew from day to day its contents became richer and more varied. The negatives were hidden in round tin cans, among them a can full of negatives from the performances of Habimah in Lodz in 1938.

Mendel again and again stressed in conversations with friends that he expected those negatives eventually to reach Tel Aviv and be given to the theatre. He did not speak of the plans for the future - he only wanted his photographs to be exhibited as testimony of what took place in the ghetto.
  
The desire to record, to record at all costs, had become part of the consciousness of the inhabitants of the ghetto. All parts of the community had become permeated by this desire, and Mendel with his camera was received with open arms and with full understanding, in workshops, in hospitals, in orphanages, in offices, in the streets.

In 1942 the Germans announced a new deportation from the ghetto and the Gestapo and members of the Kripo went from house to house selecting Jews for death. Dead bodies were collected and thrown on a heap in the cemetery. Mendel decided he need to record these events, Mendel attached himself to the gravediggers and went to the cemetery, with his camera in his hand.

Carts continued to bring in bodies but Mendel first turned his attention to the open mass grave, inside were deportees from the nearby town Zdunska Wola. They had died of suffocation in the tightly packed trains.

Mendel managed to take photographs before the gravediggers did their job of covering the evidence. Then with his slow steps he went to the hall reserved for memorials but which was now filled with bodies. From the distance the sound of rifle fire was heard, the “aktion” continued.

While photographing, Mendel marked the chests with numbers. The same numbers later appeared on the graves, and thus the families were able to identify the graves by first identifying their dead on the photographs.

The head of each body was lifted by a gravedigger, and Mendel went from one to another clicking, recording the bruised, bloody, crushed faces, faces of old people, of boys, of girls. Some of the eyes were closed, some half open, some half open, some stared with fear, some exuded the serenity of death.

The great deportation “aktion” was about to end, Mendel still managed to photograph the large wagons full of Jews condemned to death as they made their way to the concentration  places and from there to the railway station at Radegast. Again the trains rolled in the direction of Chelmno and the gas-vans and crematoria of “Sonderkommando Bothman” worked at full speed.

There followed “regular” days in the ghetto, and one could find Mendel in the streets and ghetto institutions, his lens directed toward the starving and the sick who were not allowed to be sick because there was no room for them in the ghetto, and therefore all medical institutions were liquidated. They remained only in Mendel’s photographs.

In 1943 deportations began again, the inhabitants of the ghetto still did not know to where the deportees were being taken. There were many rumours, most of them pessimistic, but some contained grains of hope.

Mendel sensed that the omens were bad, he suspected the Germans of taking the deportees to a place from which there was no return. He photographed almost exclusively the convoys, the places where the deportees were concentrated, the ghetto jail. Friends warned him against photographing the convoys, because Gestapo men were among the guards, and they would find him out. Again he heeded no warnings. In one of the ghetto workshops, a telescopic lens was being secretly constructed for him according to a sketch he prepared.

When completed, the lens performed satisfactorily, but was heavy and awkward to carry, Mendel was happy, because he could now photograph from a distance and from hiding places. He photographed the convoys from windows, following them until the deportees entered the death trains. He was in great danger when photographing the railroad station with the German police pushing the Jews into the trains.

He took the photographs hidden behind a stack of slabs of concrete belonging to a factory of prefabricated houses. The new lens did its work well.  Mendel showed particular interest in recording the activities of youth organisations in the ghetto. He appeared at meetings, photographed events.

Grossmans father (sick) in the Lodz Ghetto
All was open to him, the young people trusted him and Mendel discovered suddenly smiling faces, faith in the future, and care for fellow men. There were no longer orphanages and old people’s homes in the ghetto, and so he photographed the children in the workshops to which the entire population was mobilised.

Mendel infiltrated the parties of the ghetto elite, photographed their shameful mode of living, which was a mockery of the sufferings of the starving population. Many of Mendel’s pictures showed the institutions of the ghetto authorities. They stressed the bitter irony of the “autonomy” given to the Jews within the barbed-wire fence, the empty paraphernalia, offices, police, parades and uniforms.

He generously distributed copies of his photographs, he asked for no payments he let the pictures be kept by as many people as possible. Perhaps some would remain after the holocaust. Mendel spent his evenings locked in his darkroom, working till late at night. In the mornings he distributed prints among friends and acquaintances and kept only the negatives for himself.

He kept next to his enlarging apparatus a little crystal set with an earphone which was capable of receiving only the German radio station in Lodz. Thus he was informed on the progress of the war, but he did not indulge in commenting on the subject. His drawers were full of tin cans with more than then thousand negatives, the result of hard and stubborn work since the occupation. Those cans contained the images of people whose ashes were already scattered in the forests of Chelmno.

In them was the story of the suffering and destruction of a great Jewish community, the most telling proof of the greatest crime in human history. With the Red Army advancing on the eastern front, Mendel knew that he must now hide his precious negatives in a safe place. Mendel made a quick selection of negatives, packed the tin cans in a wooden crate.

With the help of a friend he took out a window sill in his apartment, removed some bricks, placed the crate in the hollow, then replaced the sill. The task was accomplished. The negatives seemed safe for the future. But Mendel retained his camera. The days of the Lodz ghetto final liquidation came, there was chaos everywhere, Mendel continued to photograph to the very end. He could no longer develop the film, the ghetto was almost empty.

Trains left twice a day for an unknown destination, one of the last to leave was Mendel, his camera hidden under his coat. Several days later the Gestapo found out about his activities when they found in some abandoned flats prints of his photographs – the definitive proof of their own crimes. Mendel was sent to the Konigs Wusterhausen labour camp, in the Reich where he secretly continued photographing, but not developing and printing.

When, the war front advanced and came closer, and the prisoners of the camp were taken out on the death march, Grossman collapsed and died with his camera on him. The negatives of his photographs hidden by him in the ghetto, were found by Mendel’s sister and sent to Israel, but most of them were lost during the War of Independence, when Egyptian troops captured the Nitzanim kibbutz.

One of Mendel’s closest friends Nahman Zonabend remained in the Lodz ghetto until its liberation. Although the Nazis kept him under constant surveillance, he succeeded in saving the archives of the Judenrat, and he concealed the documentary treasure, including some of Mendel’s photographs, at the bottom of a well.

After the war this material was taken out of Poland. The archives were collected and are now housed in the Museum of Holocaust and Resistance at the Ghetto Fighters House in Kibbutz Lohamei Hagetaot Israel. 

Also the photographs taken by Mendel Grossman were used in the book With a Camera in the Ghetto, published in America in 1977. 














Contextual analysis

In this photo, there are two Jewish children who look as though they are playing a role play game. The child on the left is dressed in a typical Jewish ghetto civilian uniform. However, the child on the right looks like he is dressed in the Jewish police uniform that was worn by the authorities in the ghetto, including the armband, hat and baton. There is also a factory tower in the background that was possibly used to release fumes. The thing that initially draws me to the photo was the boy in the uniform as he is dressed in black, which contrasts with the rest of the photo. 


the child on the right is smiling, looking straight down the lens, and posing as if he were arresting the other boy (holding the stick against his shoulder and holding him by the collar). He looks smug, as if he is in control. the other child is looking straight ahead with his head down and arm by his sides. This is a pose that portrays sadness or defeat, like he's given up. However, this does not appear to be the case as he is smiling too, as this is probably a fun game to them with no horrific consequences. This causes the viewer to feel pitiful towards them as they don't understand what would’ve actually happened during that time if they were both adults who were in the roles they were playing. There is also a sense of irony as they are probably good friends, but if this was a real life situation, they’d hate each other.  


One aspect of the photo that may strike the viewer as particularly horrific, is the fact that the children know exactly how to mimic the behaviour of the German police. For them to be able to do this, they must have witnessed it in the first place. This could be because the police are teaching young children what the police do and essentially brainwashing them to want to become a police officer when they’re older. Furthermore, this shows that not even the children that lived in the ghetto are protected from the trauma that occurs in the ghetto.


This photo was taken by Mendel Grossman, a German photographer who lived in the 
 Litzmannstadt ghetto, and took photos in secret of the horror that took place in the area. He used to take photos of things that represented beauty, such as clouds and flowers. As the ghetto became more and more dark and deprived of basic resources such as food and medicine, he began to try and capture the people of the ghetto instead, as they struggled to live in such an awful place. The children in the photo above are among those people. 


In the background, there seems to be what looks like a chimney. This could just be from a factory, however if this was taken after 1942, the chimney could be from a death camp, as they used gas chambers and needed a way of clearing the room of gas so that they could clear the thousands of Jews that had died out and fill it with innocent people again.


















  


shoot 7

shoot 7 Plans for shoot for this shoot, i am going to be taking portraits of some different people in the photography studio. these...